MR. YIHUA XU’s RESPONSE TO  STERLING HARWOOD”S ‘The DARK SIDE OF FRIENDSAHIP’– June 11. 2025

I’ve finished reading the latest post for several times to make sure I grasped the idea.

It is indeed a much darker piece, and I see the different “layers” or “aspects” of “friendship” it conveys. And I agree with Harwood’s statement:

“Relying on mere friendship to get us out of this mess is, as a piece of friendly advice from me to you, naïvely and overly optimistic in a way that brings us right back to the critical thinking of Voltaire’s Candide. “

I’m an engineer and engineers have this habit of looking at or analyzing things in a more “cold blooded” scientific or “data driven” way.

Thus I look at this humanly term “friendship” in a way that — it is just a mutual emotional “deposit” and “withdrawal” interactions and dynamics between two human beings (or animals). It is part of the evolution to ensure the bigger goal of the entire species — whichever species evolve to have the least selfish or destructive behavior; it is more likely to survive long on earth.

Whenever we show kindness or help someone, it is a gesture of “depositing” something good into that person’s mind; whenever we do something bad to someone, it is also a gesture of “depositing” something bad into that person’s mind.

Humans (or more broadly, animals) are “mirrors” to each other — when someone did something good to me, I feel the need to pay him back; when someone did something bad to me, I want him pay too.

This comes (or evolved) no surprise, because this mirroring “Tit-for-tat” (or “deposit/withdraw”) behavior is actually the best strategy according to the Game Theory:

With this mental model set, we could now easily explain all the possible combinations or dynamics between all these layers or aspects or interactions in “friendship” — with some simple idea also brought from banking/economy:

Imagine there are A & B,

A continuously deposits lots of good things (love, money, education) into B;

Imagine B is the “bank” of A; Could A _not_ expect any return from B but just pure “investment”?

And if A _is_ in the end expecting some return, what is his expected “interest rate” or “ROI / Return On Investment”?

Is this expected “return” from A aligned with B’s or B’s capability to *deliver* that level of return?


Should B return less (lower interest rates) or pause returning when he is in more difficult situations — is that reasonable?

Should B return more when he is more capable, and in another tit-for-tac, A should also invest more? How much is “more”?

If B somehow not returning (or simply not able to return) “enough” according to A, was A exploited? Or Should A feel exploited?…

We could easy ask tons of questions and quickly they would just cover all the “aspects” or “layers” of “friendship”.

Just like the central bank raising or lowering “interest rates” — As Warren Buffet once said: “interest rates are like gravity”, during this mutual deposit-withdrawal, tit-for-tac interactions between human beings, the “interest rates” and the expected vs. actual acts like gravity curves the spacetime between A & B, this determined whether this “relationship” or “friendship” is a healthy one like the moon orbiting the earth, planets orbiting the sun; or collide and collapsed into a black hole.

On the other hand, with regards to the topic of God and time — I’m not religious despite my parents believe in Buddha 🙂 — I’m long fascinated by Einstein’s theory of relativity, which suggests that time is not a linear progression but rather a dimension of spacetime, implying that the past, present, and future exist simultaneously.

For example: when right here right now we stare deep into the night sky, we are actually seeing the “past” of many stars, their dying lights are just able to reach into our eyes after so long a journey in the universe or spacetime. And there are all the fancy phenomena about time dilation when objects speed up…

Hope all these fun thinking brings some amusement to you. Have a nice day!

Best,

Yihua ( From Beijing – June 11, 2025 )

__________________________________________________________

BILLY’s RESPONSE to YIHUA’s LETTER:

To me, YIHUA, you have been, most caring, kind, helpful, and “TOTALLY WARM BLOODED “

Cheers  with warm affection always,

Billy – June 11, 2025

__________________________________________________________

The Dark Side of Friendship© 2025 by Sterling Harwood, J.D., Ph.D.


What could possibly go wrong with this sunny picture? First up is Butch Hancock, who said: ““Life in Lubbock, Texas taught me two things: One is that God loves you and you’re going to burn in hell. The other is that sex is the most awful, filthy thing on earth, and you should save it for someone you love.” https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/508980-life-in-lubbock-texas-taught-me-two-things-one-is, last visited May 26, 2025.


Millions or even billions fear God and even point to their fear as a source of pride: “I’m a God-fearing Christian.” I ask: “Is it consistent to fear the perfect man?” Why wouldn’t you trust the perfect man, who is your friend, to be at least fair and in all likelihood merciful and forgiving. Allowing or even causing the teeming billions of the Lord’s creations and friends to burn in hell forever surely seems strictly out of bounds.


This is a version of the so-called problem of evil. Theodicy is the field devoted to explaining away the problem of evil. One way is to say we are just in a test and those who pass the test get to go to heaven instead of roasting forever in hell. Why an omniscient being like God needs a test to get results is left unexplained? Some suggest free will is involved, specifically, that God loves us so much that he gave us a fair opportunity to earn a ticket to hell, and without warning us in the clearest of terms possible for an omnipotent being that such a fate awaits many or even almost all of us.


But let’s bring things back to earth. Next up in our list of witnesses is Jennifer Willoughby. She describes her experience, which I find eminently believable. Believe the women, some urge. So, let us at least try to do so. Here’s her story in a moving nutshell, the nub of her gist.


“[H]e could be kind and sensitive. And so I stayed. He cried and apologized. And so I stayed. He offered to get help and even went to a few counseling sessions and therapy groups. And so I stayed. He belittled my intelligence and destroyed my confidence. And so I stayed. I felt ashamed and trapped. And so I stayed. Friends and clergy didn’t believe me. And so I stayed. I was pregnant. And so I stayed. I lost the pregnancy and became depressed. And so I stayed.” ~ Jennifer Willoughby, speaking of her allegedly abusive husband Rob Porter (Republican, Mormon, Harvard University, B.A., J.D., New College, Oxford: Oxford University, M.Phil.), appearance on The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell, MSNBC, February 8, 2018.


Friendships often end badly or become exploitative. To exploit someone is to take unfair advantage of their predicament, to give a rough and ready, short and snappy, down and dirty first approximation of a definition of exploitation. Consult your experience and ask yourself, seriously ask yourself as Philosophy demands, if Willoughby’s experience resonates with you as believable, and if her experience has parallels or analogies with some friendships you have experienced. Talk amongst yourselves while I move on, since I’m scarcely done.


One might object to my damn, fool questions and examples by insisting that friendship involves loyalty and what could possibly be wrong with that, especially in the world we live in now chock full of porn websites and dating websites urging us to explore alternatives rather than loyally hang around with the person who happens to be your romantic friend at the moment. As Stephen Stills sang, “If you can’t be with the one you love, love the one your with.” And websites make it push-button easy to get together. It’s just lunch? But is the service arranging lunch with someone of your designated range of ages, interests, locations, etc. really just lunch or is it a portal to another friendship or at least to an experiment in friendship or trying to make friends.


Dale Carnegie earned some wealth showing us in a book how to win friends and influence people. Well, surely any prize you win in the great capitalist countries of the world at least must be worthwhile. So, friendship must be worthwhile, especially since it involves a good measure of loyalty.


But the above is a procedural argument. We’re following capitalist procedures to win friends and spawn loyalty. We are allowed, however, to look at results rather than just have tunnel vision about procedure. We need simply ask a few pointed questions about loyalty to see that loyalty is not all it is cracked up to be. Millions were loyal to Hitler. Hundreds or even thousands were and are loyal to the worst gangsters. Hundreds of millions are loyal to questionable, to say the least, politicians such as LBJ, Nixon, or Trump. Is such loyalty and friendship really so good that it is beyond serious question? Very well, what about the loyalty and friendships in religious cults? Consider Jim Jones’ Jonestown, David Koresh’s Branch Davidians in Waco, Texas (have you noticed that we keep coming back to Texas?), Marshall Applewhite’s Heaven’s Gate cult in the suburbs of San Diego. OK, we keep coming back to California, too. The problem of overestimating the value of friendship, as if it is scarcely a double-edged sword, is bi-coastal, and bipartisan, since we find it in red and blue states alike.


And then there step forward the enablers. Many friends, out of friendship or even love, enable their closest friends or relatives to stay addicted to dangerous substances, all too often leading to death. Suicide among the young is at an all-time high in America. Guns are the leading cause of death among children. Relying on mere friendship to get us out of this mess is, as a piece of friendly advice from me to you, naïvely and overly optimistic in a way that brings us right back to the critical thinking of Voltaire’s Candide. Discuss all this with your friends.

________________________________________________________________

The Dark Side of Friendship by ChatGPT

ChatGPT: The dark side of friendship often emerges in ways that contrast sharply with the idealized view of friendship as inherently supportive, positive, and enriching. When certain dynamics shift, friendships can lead to stress, hurt, and even harm. Here are some common aspects of this darker side:

1. Envy and Competition

  • Sometimes, friendships can foster competition, with one person feeling the need to outshine or “win” over the other. Envy can creep in when friends are at different stages of success or life milestones, leading to resentment and feelings of inadequacy. This competition often goes unspoken, making it difficult to address and potentially harming both parties.

2. Emotional Dependency and Toxicity

  • Some friendships develop a dependency where one person becomes overly reliant on the other for emotional support or validation. This can drain the energy of the friend who becomes a constant shoulder to lean on, eventually leading to resentment. When one friend’s needs consistently overshadow the other’s, the relationship may become toxic, resembling a one-sided dependency instead of a balanced, healthy connection.

3. Betrayal and Breach of Trust

  • One of the most painful experiences in friendship is betrayal, which can take the form of gossip, secrets shared without permission, or other actions that compromise trust. Once breached, trust is challenging to rebuild and can lead to lingering insecurities and doubts, not only in that friendship but also in future relationships.

4. Manipulation and Control

  • In some friendships, one person may seek to control or manipulate the other, whether consciously or unconsciously. This might manifest through guilt-tripping, constant criticism, or dictating what the other person should do. Such manipulation can erode a friend’s self-esteem and sense of autonomy, leaving them feeling trapped rather than supported.

5. Outgrowing Each Other

  • As people grow and change, sometimes friends no longer fit each other’s lives in the same way. This evolution can create tension, especially if one friend resists or resents the change. Trying to force the friendship to stay the same can prevent both friends from growing and even create animosity where there was once a camaraderie.

6. Enabling Unhealthy Behavior

  • Some friendships are built on shared habits or interests that can be harmful, such as substance abuse, negative self-talk, or reinforcing poor life choices. In these cases, friends may encourage or validate each other’s unhealthy behaviors, preventing either from making positive changes.

7. Loyalty at a Cost

  • Loyalty is often valued in friendship, but in some cases, it can be detrimental. Unquestioning loyalty can prevent someone from seeing red flags, ignoring hurtful behavior, or staying in situations that are harmful out of a sense of obligation.

8. Friendship for Convenience

  • Sometimes, friendships persist out of convenience rather than genuine affection. This can be the case in friendships formed at work, in school, or out of routine. When the practical reason for the friendship ends, the superficial connection can become a source of awkwardness or discomfort.

9. Influence on Self-Identity

  • Friendships shape self-perception, for better or worse. When a friend projects their insecurities or limitations onto the other, it can influence their friend’s self-identity in damaging ways. Over time, these interactions may contribute to limiting beliefs or self-doubt.

Exploring these darker aspects can make us more aware of potential red flags, as well as help us develop healthier boundaries and self-awareness in our relationships. Understanding the full scope of friendship—the light and the dark—helps us foster connections that are both genuine and sustainable.

__________________________________________________________________________

Set Boundaries or Space, but Not to Cut off Completely & Permanently. Treasure what has been or had been positive before. Good Memories are Precious,

ChatGPT:   Absolutely. Setting boundaries or taking space in a friendship doesn’t have to mean cutting ties or forgetting the good times you’ve shared. Friendships, like all relationships, can go through phases, and sometimes giving each other room to grow individually is necessary to keep the bond healthy. When we focus on boundaries as a way to protect ourselves and the relationship, rather than as a way to “end” things, we allow room for both parties to feel secure without erasing the meaningful parts of the connection.

Here’s how to navigate this balance:

1. Acknowledge and Honor the Good Times

  • Reflecting on what made the friendship meaningful—like shared memories, laughter, and support—helps remind both of you why the relationship matters. It can soften difficult conversations and help approach the situation with gratitude rather than frustration.

2. Communicate Openly about Boundaries

  • It can be powerful to share, kindly and honestly, what you’re feeling. Saying something like, “I need some time for myself right now, but I really value our friendship,” reinforces that the space is for individual well-being, not a desire to break the bond.

3. Set Boundaries with Compassion

  • Boundaries don’t have to be rigid or harsh. For example, setting limits around certain topics of conversation, types of support, or frequency of contact can keep the friendship from feeling overwhelming without closing the door completely. Compassionate boundaries allow you to be clear about your needs in a way that respects both of you.

4. Give Space without Guilt

  • Allowing for space without resentment or guilt can be incredibly free. It’s natural to miss each other, but knowing the purpose of space can help it feel like a temporary recharge rather than a permanent loss.

5. Appreciate What’s Gone Well, even if Dynamics Change

  • Even if a friendship doesn’t look the same as it once did, that doesn’t mean good memories are any less valuable. Embracing that friendships evolve allows you to treasure the positive moments without feeling that they’re lost or invalidated by change.

6. Check In Occasionally

  • Even if you’re taking a break, a small gesture—a message, a memory shared, or a quick hello—can maintain the connection at a healthy distance. It lets both of you know that friendship still matters, even as you honor new boundaries.

Creating this balance is ultimately a way to protect what’s good in the friendship without sacrificing personal well-being. Boundaries and space, handled with respect and appreciation, are not just ways to maintain the connection; they’re ways to ensure that the best parts of the friendship continue to be cherished and preserved

_________________________________________________________________.______________________

“ Boola  Boola Boula In Fiji  Means “We’re Happy You’re Here, Welcome, We Love You “ explained  Marsha Vande Berg, President of MJGlobal Insight- July 2024

Boola, Boola, rang out the cry. Faces turned up in smiles even though not even the Americans among us understood the words’ meaning. That is unless they were Yale University graduates or citizens of Fiji! Boola, boola is the recurring verse of the Yale song sung worldwide by Yalies and Yalie fans. In Fiji, it’s repeated three times in a greeting – We’re happy you’re here; welcome – we love you. 

On this sunny day in 2000 as the China economy was just beginning to open up,  boola, boola was the cry of a smiling Chinese American, Billy Lee, who hailed originally from Ningpo and who gradated from Yale School of Architecture and is now retired in California , USA. On that sunny day, Billy was focused on performing in an impromptu skit before a small group of Chinese citizens in a village in Yunnan Province. Back in San Francisco, he and the five others in the traveling delegation, including this author, were members of The 1990 Institute and by extension, guests in this western, China province of the All China Women’s Federation. All but the author spoke Chinese. I dare say fewer in the audience seated on the outdoor folding chairs spoke English! 

But we were determined to communicate, and hence we performed a skit.

Our intent was pretty simple: extending friendship that is curious yet speaks without judgment of the other. We spoke different languages but we regarded the gathering as an opportunity to share a common embrace, a willingness to break bread with one another and to express gentle curiosity about each other’s way of life.  To this day, we value this experience as a gesture on behalf of cross-cultural friendship. It works when it can happen with an open heart and open hands. Its effect multiplies when it grasps the potential for bridging otherwise difficult times in geopolitics and between behemoth economies.

Boola, boola, boola became our collective chant back in 2000 in Yunnan Province. Going forward, we knew it pointed to a better way for realizing friendship that’s measured not in trade dollars or competitive economics but in smiles and a handshake or two. We realized too that the chant would unlock memories of friendship shared without judgment. Boola, boola! 

Marsha Vande Berg is president of MJGlobal Insights, a international corporate and non profit director and advisor. Find her at: linkedin.com/in/mjvb

Holistic Thinking As Succinctly As I Can by Stephen Lee – Key Words & Current Questions – July, 2024

What” is the Whole to think about?

The Wholest Whole is only limited by the ability of my imagination. The key definition is the boundary (if it exists) for including everything, and over all time. What is “everything” then … ? Holistic Thinking can be applied to a smaller Whole. But the conclusions we draw from that thinking will very likely have room for improvement when we look beyond the boundary.

An Example of Parts of one Incomplete Whole

The Universe

The Earth and All Living Things

Ethnic or Religious Groups Nations

Groups and Organizations of People

Families and Friends

Individuals

This is just one way to break the Whole into units, down to individual persons who interact over time with one another and the other parts of the Whole.

Smaller than the human size is the other direction for the boundary of the Whole to expand. Virus, nano particles, atoms, photons, Higgs particle? Invisible fields? Thoughts?

Consciousness? Free Will? Soul? “God”?

In addition to space and time as the dimensions to draw the boundary of the Whole, consider also the “dimension” consisting of the foundation assumptions of your belief system for truth and life purpose. What if some part of my belief system is different from that of another person?

Why Think in Full Consideration of the Whole?

What is your answer to this question? Our personal answer to this question is the best way to start a personal mental, emotional or spiritual journey. I leave this as an open question.

How to Think Holistically?

1. When a question (especially a serious one) comes to my mind and I want to make an evaluation or a decision about what to do next, and I have sufficient time to carefully and rationally consider the what, why, how and the possible consequences of the different paths which are open for me to choose, I would try to look at the Whole picture and consider the effects of each of my possible choices or decisions on the future paths of each of the parts of the Whole. When my choice affects another person, I need to consider what the effects are and how that person will react or choose to react. This is obviously an immense mental exercise and depending on the time available, a blend of personal rules of wisdom may need to be used. One technique is to think logically on all different parts of the question and then “sleep on it”. More ideas may pop up after our brain or our mind somehow connects the dots and then suggests some new ideas or an answer.

2. How do I know that I have found the best answer? When my mind finally can rest in peace and harmony with myself on this question. Recognizing that this is still my personal answer to my question, I accept it as a tentative solution, subject to personal lessons yet to be learned.

3. How and why we choose among the different paths ahead of us is the most difficult part of Holistic Thinking. It defines our individual wants in our own mind and in our estimation of others’ wants as well. Ultimately, if we think about what makes us happy about our whole life or what purpose, if any, we want to strive for in our life, this step of Holistic Thinking rounds out the Wholeness into a potential Unity in the Diversity of the Universe.

4. The most fatal mistake in critical or logical thinking is the False Dichotomy or the Excluded Middle (described by Carl Sagan in his Baloney Detection Kit). By casting a problem as a choice between black or white only, the argument promotes polarization. “If you are not with us, you are against us!”

5. For Holistic Thinking to be more complete, it is necessary to understand uncertainty, and learn how to make evaluation which considers uncertainty, especially when the uncertainty has a range of possibilities.

Some Key Words or Thoughts to Stimulate Holistic Thinking

● Interconnected ● Interdependence ● Working together ● See big picture ● Recognize patterns ● Parts working together for the Whole ● Cause and multiple Effects ● Multiple perspectives ● How to cut and share a Pie ● Is there a way to make everyone happy? ● What mode of interaction among the parts can make the Whole better?

Some Current Questions for Thinking Holistically

● Why is the behavior of my grandchildren so different from my own childhood behavior?

● Why has the influence of some religions declined?

● Why has Democracy in many countries become polarized or fragmented or appearing less ideal?

● Why global climate changes have not yet been taken up as an urgent world effort?

_______________________________________________________

Friendship and Compassion

STEPHEN LEE CONTINUES TO EXPLORE DIFFERENT CHARTS –

From: “Mindfulness Turns A Brain from Antagony to Compassion” to “Self-assessment For Personal Growth in Good Citizenship”, to adding “Four Levels of Friendship” to the above.   May 2023

It occurred to me after creating the two-dimensional and four-quadrant chart in my last posting on How to Turn Fear to Compassion, that there is an interpretation for the number inside each small box of the chart.

An obvious interpretation is a score of Fear vs Compassion, ranging from -8 to +8.

Let’s explore the following definition:

Good Citizenship = Unselfishness + Understanding of the Needs of Others

Poor Citizenship = Selfishness + Suspicion of the Intention of Others

Then we can interpret the numbers in each small block of the chart as a Score of Good or Poor Citizenship. In this perspective, the words in the lower left quadrant should be revised to describe poor citizenship. The new chart is as follows.

A score of zero may be described as an Indifferent citizen. A score of 1 – 2 may be described as a citizen with Pity for others. A score of 3 – 4 as one with Sympathy, 5 – 6 as one with Empathy, and 7 – 8 as one with Compassion.

On the score of Poor Citizenship, the adjectives to describe the different levels may be Passive, Cautious, Resentful, and Antagonistic?

Citizenship Score (-8 to +8)

If a social score (from -8 to +8) is self-awarded to a person after a mindful act self-assessed with a Citizenship Score, it would be informative to self-ask how he or she would rate his or her level of Selfishness to Unselfishness, from -4 to +4. This is of course a subjective and qualitative self evaluation, but over time, the self assessment will still provide a valuable indicator of self improvement.

Then the two numbers, the social score and the self rating of Unselfishness, would be two useful statistics. They can be also visualized as statistical distributions or a statistical mean value of the person doing the self assessment or for a group of people if the data are collected for people in different groups, socially or culturally. If both the social score and the self-assessed Unselfish index for a population are plotted as a statistical distribution on top of the chart, as shown in the following chart, for two different years, the improvement would be noticeable.

This approach would also be used for comparing different groups of people over the same year of study, for example, to see if culture makes a difference.

_____________________________________________________________________

A NEW CHART EXTENDING COMPASSION INTO FOUR LEVELS OF FRIENDSHIP.

Acquaintance

Friends

Close Friends, and

Bonded Friends   ( This last one is akin to the Chinese male bonding of Yi Qi )